1 The retractions came only months after BioMed Central.

An editor at one of the journals published by Sage Publications became suspicious, sparking a thorough and lengthy investigation, which resulted in the retraction of 60 articles in July 2014. At the final end of 2014, BioMed Central and other publishers alerted the international Committee on Publication Ethics to new forms of systematic attempts to control journals’ peer-review procedures. According to a declaration published on COPE’s site in January 2015, these attempts to hijack the scholarly review system were evidently orchestrated by companies that 1st helped authors compose or improve their scientific articles and sold them favorable peer reviews.4 BioMed Central conducted a comprehensive investigation of most their recently published content and identified 43 which were published based on reviews from fabricated reviewers.The concentrate of the collaboration is to teach healthcare specialists about the availability and reliability of a rapid and easy-to-use platelet function test, also to stress the need for assessing each patient’s platelet response to antiplatelet medications. Related StoriesTesting amniotic liquid could guide doctors to make delivery planning decisions for preterm birthsBerkeley Laboratory scientists identify genetic factors that impact neurological disorders and body weightMedUni Vienna experts discover genetic cause of a uncommon disease By working closely with Daiichi Sankyo and Lilly, we desire to offer greater knowledge of platelet function tests as a means to help physicians assess sufferers’ platelet response to antiplatelet therapy, said Timothy I.